Friday, September 27, 2019

Cold Calling Pitfalls

This blog post is about cold calling. Randomly calling on students can go well, but it's not so easy as pulling a name and asking, "What's the answer!?"

The pitfalls of basic random cold calling is that it's not an equitable practice in its barebones form. Some issues include (but are not limited to) the following.

  1. Making a mistake in front of the whole class can be stressful. This is a high risk situation.
  2. Not everyone thinks fast, so they may be in the process of figuring something out, and then called on the spot to have the goods, right then and there. 
  3. Thinking fast is not necessarily smart, and thinking slowly is not necessarily not-smart. But having to be quick on your feet biases the definition of smart as having the answer quickly in class on the spot.
  4. Stereotype threat can be triggered. Some students are the only one of their identity in your class. If this student makes a mistake, then the stereotypes could be "validated." 
What can we do?
Randomizing who contributes does have a positive facet. It spreads the chances around. That's good. The key is to do it in an inclusive way.

Here's one example:
Instead of going with something like "What's the answer!?"you can add think-pair-share into the mix.  First, state the question or task, and ask students to think first and the talk to their partner. Then when you select a person at random, the prompt could be, "Share with us what you discussed with your partner." What students share could be a partial answer, a question, a comment, the whole answer, or perhaps asking for another minute to finish their conversation. If framed as a way to generate discussion and engagement, rather than having to be right, this can reduce anxiety and be a more inviting experience.

Riffs: We can think of think-pair-share as the base layer, and add on or adapt layers above it. Instead of randomly calling on a pair, you could visit a few groups and see what they tried. You can usually very quickly find a pair willing to share. Quiet students who have a useful idea can be encouraged to share, and this specific teacher move is where you enact inclusion! The quiet student is invited in by the instructor and is validated for having something worthy of being shared.  

Keeping track of who has shared will then help you spread chances equitably.  This riff works well earlier in the term, as you are developing student buy-in and comfort with talking about and discussing math. It's lower stakes, and doesn't put people on the spot.

Another riff is for classes that include student presentations. Assigning randomly the first chimers is a way to spread who makes the comments. Otherwise, it's the usual people raising their hands again and again. This can be done by selecting two students, then asking everyone to talk to their partner about the presented work. The selected students chime in first. They can ask a question, comment, or give a compliment. Again the contributions are done in a way, where students have time to think, discuss, and prepare remarks. Once the first chimers have made their comments, you can open the floor for further comments.

Cold calling can be warmed up with some additions and tweak. Using a small amount of time, allowing for thinking and talking, and taking perceived judgment off the table, creates an environment where students are less concerned about how they might appear and more focused on the Math. 

Monday, September 16, 2019

Mathematics and Social Justice: Interview with Dr. Kyndall Brown, Executive Director, California Math Project

Hi everyone! It's my great pleasure to share with you an interview with Dr. Kyndall Brown, California Math Project. The main theme of this interview is Mathematics and social justice.

Please tell us about yourself and your current position and how you became interested in mathematics education.
I am the executive director of the California Mathematics Project. I oversee a statewide network of professional development organizations whose charge is to provide professional and leadership development for k-12 teachers of mathematics. There are 19 sites of CMP that are housed at UC and CSU campuses. We bring together mathematicians, mathematics educators, and classroom teacher leaders to put on institutes, as well as school-based professional development programs. We are supported by state and federal funds. We are mandated to center our work in low-performing schools and district.

I started my teaching career in 1985 at Manual Arts HS in LAUSD. Because I had a BS in mathematics, I was able to receive an emergency credential to teach secondary mathematics. I immediately discovered that I needed some support if I was going to get the hang of teaching. I think this is where my interest in mathematics education began. During the Summer after my first year of teaching, in order to get the units I needed to renew my emergency credential, I attended two CMP institutes; one at UCLA, and one at CSULA.  In the fall of 1986, I entered a credential program at CSUDH, where I had my first courses in educational psychology and learning theory. I became exposed to Jean Piaget’s theory of constructivism, which had a huge impact on my teaching  practice. I always took advantage of professional development opportunities and learned a lot from them. Fast forward to 1994. I was teaching at a high school when a coworker and colleague of mine invited me to apply to attend a Summer leadership institute at the UCLA Mathematics Project. I attended the four-week institute and ended up becoming a teacher leader for the project. I presented workshops and sessions at other UCLAMP leadership institutes. UCLAMP would use me as a professional development provider in some of their fee-for service contracts with schools in LA County. In 1999, was asked to come on full time at UCLAMP as co-director. Several years later, I took over as the director of UCLAMP. In 2012, I became the executive director of the CMP statewide office.

Math instructors may not be aware of the issues related to Mathematics and social justice. Why does equity and inclusion matter?
Equity and inclusion matters because we live in a multi-racial, multicultural, democratic society. In order for a democracy to function, we need an educated electorate. Technology is becoming more ubiquitous. More industries and jobs are becoming automated. Instead of being taught how to perform rote computations with speed and accuracy, students need to learn how to become critical problem solvers

Education needs to keep up with the trends in the larger society.  The Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21) has created a framework that describes the skills learners will need to be successful in the 21st century.

P21 states that 21st century  learners must:
  • Learn from and working collaboratively with individuals representing diverse cultures, religions, and lifestyles in a spirit of mutual respect and open dialogue in personal, work, and community contexts
  • Be open and responsive to new and diverse perspectives; incorporate group input and feedback into the work
  • Communicate effectively in diverse environments (including multi-lingual)
  • Demonstrate ability to work effectively and respectfully with diverse teams
  • Respect cultural differences and work effectively with people from a range of social and cultural backgrounds.
  • These skills can and should be incorporated into all mathematics instruction K-12.
If we choose to not educate all of the people in our society, then we will perpetuate a caste system based largely on race and socio-economic status. When people do not have access to a quality education, they are usually relegated to low-income employment, and are more likely to get caught up in cycles of poverty and the criminal justice system.There is a shortage of people qualified to fill some of the most important jobs like nurses, doctors, engineers, architects, as well as skilled trades like electricians, carpenters, machinists, welders, mechanics, and plumbers. We cannot continue to progress and a society if we do not have people to do these important jobs.

Dr. Robert Moses was a voting rights activist during the Civil Right Movement in the 1950’s and 60’s. Dr. Moses’ work in the southern US was focused on increasing the literacy of African-American share croppers so that they could gain the right to vote. In the 1980’s, Dr. Moses recognized that, similar to the civil rights movement in the 60’s, too many African-American students were mathematically illiterate. He recognized that lack of access to algebra would cause African-American students to be left out of the technological careers of the 21st century. For this reason, he created the Algebra Project curriculum. The Algebra Project curriculum is a hands-on, culturally relevant curriculum that uses real-world context to teach Algebra concepts. (Radical Equations: Civil Rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project, R. P. Moses, 2002, Beacon Press)

Tell us about the work you are doing related to mathematics and social justice. 
My work on mathematics and social justice is an outgrowth of my long-term interest in equity and access in mathematics. I have always taught in either low-performing schools, or schools that had large numbers of students who were low-achieving. I have always believed that it is my job to make sure that even the lowest achieving had access to high quality mathematics instruction. When I began associating with UCLAMP, I was pleased to see their emphasis on access and equity. Those early discussions naturally led into culturally relevant and responsive pedagogy. In 2005, Rethinking Mathematics: Social Justice by the Numbers was published. The book had a number of social justice lessons that  I began to use in professional development, as well as mathematics methods courses. Since then, a number of books have been published on the topic of social justice and mathematics education. In 2016, TODOS:Mathematics for All, and NCSM published a joint position statement on Mathematics through the lens of Social Justice. I have been using that document in a number of different professional development workshops and keynotes. For the past two years, I have co-presented a pre-conference workshop on Social Justice and Mathematics  for NCTM. I also co-facilitated a two-day institute on Social Justice and Mathematics in the LA area in 2017. I have also created social justice lessons. The is a bi-annual conference entitled Creating Balance in an Unjust World that focuses on social justice and mathematics.

Are mathematics classrooms inclusive, equitable? Why or why not?
In general, no. Mathematics classes still tend to engage in tracking. Mathematics classes are still very teacher centered. Only students in advanced mathematics classes have opportunities to engage in high level, cognitively demanding mathematics. Too many students are exposed to mathematics instruction that is based upon rote memorization and drill-and-practice. Their are huge achievement/opportunity gaps in mathematics performance that are based upon race and class. Low-income students of color are usually concentrated in the lower-level classes, while affluent white and Asian students are more likely to be found enrolled in advanced mathematics courses. This is exacerbated by a lack of qualified teachers of mathematics that results in low-performing schools facing shortages of qualified mathematics teachers and limited course offerings.

Why are tracking and teacher-centered instruction problematic?
There have been education scholars that have been study the ill-effects of tracking for years (Jeannie Oaks). Tracking labels some students as mathematically capable and others as not capable. These labels are usually based upon standardized test scores or other types of assessments and are not very valid or reliable.

Dr. Lee Stiff worked with a school district in North Carolina that was concerned that their African American students were not enrolled in 8th grade algebra. After learning the admission policy for algebra one, Stiff identified a large number of African American students who met the admission criteria, but had not been admitted to algebra one. After the qualified students were identified, they were properly placed in algebra one, and all of them passed. The situation has become so dire in California, that in 2015 the state legislature passed a law that schools have to make their mathematics placement criteria public and create a plan to inform all parents of the  placement criteria.
San Francisco Unified School District took the bold step a few yeas ago to eliminate all tracking in mathematics. The district eliminated acceleration in middle school and require all students to enroll in algebra in the ninth grade. Acceleration cannot occur until after the students have taken geometry.
For example, in the elementary grades, students are required to complete timed tests, where they have to complete 100 multiplication problems in one minute. These types of assessments send the message that mathematics is about speed and accuracy as opposed to critical thinking and problem solving.
Once a student gets tracked, it is virtually impossible for them to get out of the track they have been placed into. This can impact whether or not students will ever have access to college preparatory mathematics when they get to high school, which will impact whether or not they can get into college, and what they can study when they get there.

Teacher-centered instruction is a philosophy of teaching that dominates mathematics instruction in the US at all levels. A teacher-centered classroom assumes that students come to the learning environment as empty vessels to be filled with the wisdom and knowledge of the teachers. Teachers provide a lecture to students where they passively take notes. The teacher demonstrates how to work mathematical exercises. Students repeat the procedures shown to them by the teacher. Students are given several mathematical exercises to practice on their own. Students are given a few dozen mathematical exercises to complete as homework. Teachers don’t find out what students understand until they assess them with a quiz or test. Education researchers refer to this method of teaching as Initiate-Response-Evaluation (IRE). This method of teaching works for a very few students.
A student centered approach to teaching is one that connects mathematics content to student’s prior knowledge. Students are given high level, cognitively demanding mathematical tasks to solve. Students are allowed to work together in groups to solve problems. Teachers support students by asking probing questions to push their thinking. Teachers provide instruction when students need it in order to solve problems. Students are provided with the tools and technology necessary to engage in complex mathematical tasks. Teachers use a variety of strategies to assess student understanding beyond paper and pencil tests.  This method of teaching opens up opportunities for all students to be successful in the mathematics classroom.

What can math teachers do to make progress?
There are examples of schools and districts that have had success in creating more equitable environments for students.

San Lorenzo HS in northern CA, Core Principles
  • All teachers and students are learners
  • Working from strengths while making space for vulnerability
  • Redefining “smart”
  • Redefining what it means to do math in school
  • The importance of relationships
  • Department Goals
  • Detracking 8th Grade Mathematics and  Algebra I
  • Creating a reform-based curriculum that supported Complex Instruction pedagogy
  • Reducing rates of D/F grades
  • Understanding the needs and experiences of African-American students
  • Responding to the challenges of  standardized tests
  • At the start of 9th grade, San Lorenzo students were scoring at significantly lower levels than the students at the  2  comparison schools
  • Within 2 years, Railside students were significantly outperforming students at the other schools
  • San Lorenzo students were more positive about mathematics, took more mathematics, and planned to pursue mathematics in college
  • Achievement differences among different ethnic groups were reduced or eliminated
  • By their senior year, 41% of San Lorenzo students were taking advanced courses compared to 27% of students at the other schools
  • A few years ago San Francisco Unified School District detracked their mathematics program as well.

What can parents do?
  • Play games that involve mathematics (e.g. card games, dice games, dominoes, puzzles, etc.) 
  • Share with their children how they use mathematics in their work and home lives. S
  • peak positively about mathematics. 
  • Get involved at school. Meet their children’s mathematics teachers. 
  • Have their children explain the solutions to their mathematics problems from school. 
  • Advocate for high quality mathematics instruction at school. 
  • Read “Mathematical Mindsets” by Jo Boaler, Stanford University

How can administrators support these efforts?
Be knowledgeable of the California Framework and standards. Know what high quality mathematics instruction looks like. Visit mathematics classrooms and provide guidance and feedback to teachers (SERP 5X8 card[b]). Provide time for mathematics teachers to collaborate, visit each others classrooms, evaluate student work together.

How can college math instructors get involved?
College math instructors can get involved in several ways.
  1. Focus on your classes first
  2. Read the TODOS joint position statement
  3. Start or join a Math Teacher Circle or Math Circle
  4. Read Eric Gutstein's book, Reading and Writing the World with Mathematics: Toward a Pedagogy for Social Justice
  5. Go to NCTM and learn more about the issues via their publications and conferences.
  6. The AMS-MAA published a textbook on Mathematics for Social Justice (
I think college mathematics instructors have a larger distance to travel on this issue. College mathematics instructors have not taken educational psychology courses or mathematics methods courses. They did not have supervised teaching prior to starting their teaching careers. As an undergraduate mathematics major, all of the instruction I experienced was teacher centered.  College mathematics instructors need to first educate themselves about what it means to teach mathematics for understanding. Once mathematics instructors are up to speed on teaching and learning theory, then they can read the TODOS/NCSM Joint Position Statement and the research that supports it. They can read the works of Eric Gutstein and other related authors. Then they can start making the suggested changes to their instructional strategies.

It would be helpful if mathematics instructors could work in collaboration with one another to change their practices by doing things like planning lessons together, observing each other’s teaching and providing feedback, and looking at student work together.

Mathematics instructors need to join organizations like the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, The Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, the American Mathematical Association, and the Mathematical Association of America, and attend conferences and workshops that focus on successful pedagogical approaches.

Has there been any pushback or backlash in this area of work?
There are people who disagree with this point of view.  people work in social justice in Mathematics. Pushback from people who want to keep the status quo. Think about school buy-in. Student buy-in, teacher buy-in, parent buy-in, administrator buy-in.

There is pushback from people who are not in agreement with the movement for access, equity, and social justice in mathematics education. There are traditional teachers of mathematics who do not see anything wrong with the current system of mathematics education, and feel no need to change their practices. There are mathematics teachers who are opposed to introducing social justice topics into the mathematics curriculum. Many teachers feel that their role is to serve as a gatekeeper, keeping students they don’t deem capable of taking advanced mathematics tracked into lower level classes.

There are parents who like a system that privileges their children over other children. In this case, they understand that there are sometimes only one or two advanced placement mathematics courses offered in a school. Traditionally these classes are kept to an enrollment of thirty students or less. Many parents feel that if more students are given access to advanced placement mathematics courses, there will be fewer opportunities for their children. Schools and districts have a responsibility to find ways to increase the pipeline of students who are prepared for advanced placement mathematics while finding ways to offer more spaces to accommodate these students.

  1. Read the Joint Position Statement by TODOS and NCSM.  Learn about equitable teaching practices that you can use in your classroom. Here’s a link to 21 practices you can use in your classes.  HERE Tanner, K. (2013). Structure matters: Twenty-one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 322-331.
  2. California Math Project:
  3. TODOS: Excellence and Equity in Mathematics 
  4. Mathematics for Equity (San Lorenzo, HS)
  5. Rehumanizing Mathematics for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx Students, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  6. SERP 5x8 to assist teachers and administrators in improving math classes via observation.

Thursday, September 5, 2019

Student Buy-In Strikes Back

An Arstechnica article is making the rounds essentially about student buy-in. There are several layers to unpack here.

First, here's a link to the article: College students think they learn less with an effective teaching method They don't even realize they've learned more.

The key point of the article is that students liked lectures more, but did statistically better when taught via active learning. The article ends with suggesting that instructors give a short lecture on the benefits of active learning to deal with the issue.  Giving a pep talk is a good starting point, but not enough.

Why do we even need to work on student buy-in? The overarching reason is because teaching is a cultural activity. When people walk into a classroom, they have default, often unacknowledged assumptions about what is "supposed to happen." Deviations from the norms can create tension.

We need to unpack this further. In math, we have Math anxiety that messes up a lot of students. In general, we could describe this as having fixed mindsets about intelligence. "I'm not a math person" or "I learn best when shown all the steps that I can memorize..." come up as signals of this. This matters when we get to a point where students get stuck. Getting stuck is exactly the point where we have to confront our images of ourselves.  Getting stuck has been implicitly learned as equivalent to being stupid. The "smart" ones get it fast, and if you're not fast you're not smart. This is actually something that comes in education research (under the heading "Nonavailing beliefs", which are beliefs that inhibit or do not support learning).

When an instructor uses active learning that sets students up to have to make sense of something actively, then it's natural for students to get stuck sometimes. And when students get stuck, all those issues mentioned above get activated.

Another layer is the "answer getting" culture we've created. Much of school success has been about getting the answer. The most common questions that are asked in class are "What's the answer?" and "Is this right?" Rarely is it about, "Why is this true?" or "How else could we approach this idea?" So when we ask students to process ideas at a deep level, rather than crank out answers, then it creates yet another tension -- "Is this going to be on the test?"

Smart has been co-opted. Let's re-co-opt smart. Smart is working on ideas and problems, getting stuck, trying new ideas, collaborating, and so on... Smart is thinking of education as a journey. We need to educate students (and parents) what being smart is. With growth mindset research, we have a framework to have productive discussions about this.

Teaching is also a system. So if you teach X, but test Y, there's a problem obviously. But life is more subtle. If we focus on process in active learning, but test the easy-to-test things for whatever reason, then our assessments are saying we value Y, but our activities are saying we value X. Actions speak louder than words, and assessment is where you put your money where your mouth is as a teacher. The point here is the conditioning students go through is not just about what happens in class, but about the whole experience. Assessment is one of the big pieces of a class, and affects how students view learning. It's not just what activities we use in class. We also need to align our assessments (both summative and formative).

Perhaps one of the more troubling ideas from the article is that students can't identify they learned more. This made me pause.  This isn't new news, but it's a reminder.  Let's think about this.  In almost any other context this is truly odd. If you're learning to play the trumpet and are learning to hit high notes, you know when you've learned it. Of course, there's nuance in learning music, so I'm not trying to make it a binary learning outcome. But if students don't recognize they have learned more, it's a sign that there's more than just the specific teaching that's not right. One thing that jumps out is feedback and coaching. Students need regular feedback that they are learning and making good progress. Pointing out successes regularly and equitably is essential and goes a long way. "We learned this... Way to go, and we learned this because we worked on it, got stuck, and figured it out. That's smart!"

Now all this sounds like I might be blaming students to some extent. I'm not. Not in the slightest. This is about unpacking the layers of our system. Circling back and putting the layers together, we get the outcomes our teaching culture is designed to achieve, whether we realize it or not. We still have holdovers from the roots of the industrial revolution, where our model for education was created using a factory model. You know, bolt on the knowledge and you're good to go. But our goals are different today, and we are shifting towards humanistic education. That is education for developing people as human intellectuals.

Student buy-in is generally about this broader cultural shift. When students walk in the door it's our job as teachers to help them make this transition in mindset and purpose. If we just change the way we teach, and don't inform students, it's on us if they walk away with a bitter aftertaste.

How to get started? Let's get practical. After all that blabbing above, we need things we can do in class that work.  Linked below is a post from earlier this summer with a collection of links from what to do on Day 1 to ongoing strategies to digging deeper into Math Anxiety.

Student Buy-In In Practice Overview

And just yesterday I wrote a letter to students that can be used as a starting point to get students on board.

Letter: Dear Student

Wednesday, September 4, 2019

Letter: Dear Student

This letter is to students in college math classes, but might apply in other settings such as secondary math or other subjects.

Dear Student,
I am writing this letter to you, because your instructor, other instructors, all of us care. We care deeply about your success. We care about your future, and the future of others. That's why we went into teaching in the first place, a profession notorious for long hours, high commitment, and not the highest wages. Teaching is a calling, and our calling specifically is to help young people today to prepare them to solve tomorrow's problems. Teaching is a social responsibility to young people, to prepare young people with the knowledge, creative thinking, and values needed to live healthy, successful, impactful and meaningful lives.

Consider this next idea for a few minutes about time... Children who are in kindergarten today will retire in about  60 years. I write this in 2019, and that means a student in kindergarten will retire around the year 2079.  2079!  Think of the difference between what your life is like today, compared to 1959. The world has changed drastically in ways that people in 1959 could not predict. No way they could foresee smart phones, google, climate change, automation, globalization, etc.   The main point I want to get to is that there are questions and problems that young people (you) will have to solve that have not even been thought of yet by anyone on the planet. Your education today must prepare you to solve these unstated, problems far out into future.

What this means is that getting the answer in the back of the book isn't nearly enough.  Yes, it's good to check your answers sometimes, but that's just a small part of your education. Yes, it might have worked to get you into college or through your last math class. I totally get it. But learning isn't a set of check boxes or getting the answer that is in the back of the book. The people who invented the iPhone or the people who put the first human on the moon or your favorite band or your pediatrician or whomever else you admire or appreciate, they solved real-world problems and looked far beyond the back of the book. At some point, logic, reason, and creativity is what you need. Answers might be good for checking things off, but really the learning is the process to getting to the answer and being stuck on good questions that make you think.

Let's unpack some of the details. It's okay to ask, "Is this right?"  Please ask for help, and ask for help every time you need it, even for small questions. But I hope you also go farther, and ask questions that expand your thinking. "Why does this work?" or "Why doesn't this work?" or "Is there another way to look at this?" Memorizing isn't thinking, by the way. We can teach computers to memorize better than humans, and thus memorizing isn't as important as it might seem. Sure it might help you get back a multiple-choice test, but really in your future life multiple-choice tests won't be how we tackle something big like climate change.  The big goals of your education include deep understanding, being able to explain complex ideas with nuance, being able to learn from others, and being able to use ideas creatively in new ways often collaboratively.  Hence asking for help should be part of a larger process to make sense and expand your understanding and thinking. Learning is fun when it makes sense! And if it doesn't make sense, then keep on trying to understand and get help.

You can get help from various resources. Resource number 1 is your instructor. That's the person who is responsible to your learning. Next there are your classmates, your textbook, the tutoring center, and perhaps the internet. Try and talk to as many humans beings as you can first. Math is learned better with more human interaction.

Office Hours: Office hours are for you, and if you are stuck on something, even a small thing, go to office hours. It's not an imposition when you show up, and your instructors want to help you. Even if you instructor seems completely different than you, you can and should ask for help. While it might seem a bit scary, it's ok. I know a ton of math instructors, and so far all of them are human beings, and are really nice in office hours. Some even have a sense of humor! I know that might be shocking, but it's true. And when they go home, they go home to things like cats and children, and watch TV or text their friends about Friday plans, just like you.

Yes, there exist legends of math geniuses, who work in their attics for years to invent math. That works for them in certain contexts, but none of them worked alone or got to that  point all by themselves. They have collaborators, consultants, books,... they actually went to school with other human beings at some point in their lives (and interacted with them). They read journal articles, they attend seminars, they go to conferences. Some people gave them a job, so opportunities were given to them. No one is 100% self made. Therefore, work with other people regularly, even if you don't view yourself as "social" in the everyday sense of the word or are introverted. In this letter, I mean social in a school or workplace sense. We all have to communicate with others to give and receive feedback, as well as brainstorm new ideas.

And really I hope you get stuck a bunch of times in your learning process (in a safe learning environment, not on tests).  Get stuck??? Yes, get stuck. Because you need to push your personal abilities. Each time you get stuck and unstuck, you learn what works and what doesn't work and you get smarter. Through working on problem solving in math (or any field), you are doing something like going to the gym for your brain. Your brain will get stronger, and you'll learn new ways to think, see, and feel.

Math anxiety is a real thing. I've written about it many times on this blog. I've talked to hundreds of students about it. I'm sorry about this. Math anxiety should not exist. Not everything in the world is right, and math anxiety is one of those wrongs that we are trying to fix.  In the meantime, if you had experiences that led you to math anxiety, what you need to know is that it's not your fault! You're not dumb, you're capable, and there is a way out.

The way out is doable. It's shifting from a fixed mindset (where one views their math abilities as fixed at birth), to a growth mindset, where one views effort and practice as the ingredients for getting smarter.  Think about one of your hobbies or interests. How did you get better at it? You practiced. You might have had a teacher or coach or watched videos, but at the end of the day you put in the focused, dedicated hours, and did the work. That's being smart, and from now on, we are co-opting the word smart.  Getting smarter at math is exactly same. A good teacher will provide you with a positive class environment and support you through your specific learning challenges, and when you practice, think, ask questions, collaborate, and do all those things people do in every profession and hobby, you'll make real progress.

Only watching videos of other people doing the math isn't going to cut it. Look I get it. Khan Academy is one click away. It's a useful resource, and I even watch KA sometimes to see which ones might help my students. Whenever I need to fix something in my house, I find a video on how to fix it. That's a good way to get information that you lack. However, learning math is like learning to be a musician or athlete. It's not just information and facts, but also about developing thinking and problem-solving skills. Doing better at math requires thinking mathematically, which is analogous to learning to ride a bicycle. You can't be taught to ride a bicycle beyond the basics by watching a video, because there are things your brain and body have to construct by actually doing it in order to build that skill.  Mathematical thinking is the same in that you can't just get info uploaded into your brain like a firmware update. You also need to construct understanding and meaning for yourself, just like your body and brain have to construct things in order to ride a bicycle safely.

Another example is learning how to hit a baseball/softball. We could watch tutorials all day and understand what we need to do. Basically it's swing a bat and hit a ball. But only watching videos is obviously not enough.  We need to actually swing a real bat and hit a real ball and get ongoing feedback from coaches. And then practice, play games, strike out, reflect, rest, repeat.  It takes time to get good at it. That's the perspective you should have about Math and watching videos. Sure watch videos sometimes to get some info, but don't stop there. Start there, and do the work. Do your own reps on real problems. Otherwise, you'd just watching, and that is just sitting in the stands. You need to be on the field, because this is your life and your future. Get in the game!

Hopefully, your instructor will ask you to work with your classmates sometimes on a question or task. In education this is called active learning and is part of inquiry-based learning (IBL). These methods are designed specifically for you to engage and think for yourself. Listening to someone isn't enough. Sometimes we need to hear ideas from the instructor that we can't easily build ourselves, but like sports or music or any hobby, you ultimately need to be the one engaged in the process, asking questions, and taking ownership of your development.

Learning to work with others is critically important. Working in groups is not only about helping one another, although that's a good aspect of group work. One of the main benefits of group work is learning through discourse. Sometimes we need to talk things out in order to make sense of what is going on, and hearing other people's ideas can also benefit all of us, and helps us engage in the process of trying and refining new ideas. Another benefit of group work is learning to communicate. In an era when more and more repetitive tasks are being automated, the ability to do humanistic work, such as communication and problem solving, is much more important and valuable.

Try to contribute to group discussions and regularly invite your group mates to share... "So what do you think? What did you get? [smile]"  It's not about one person getting the answer for the group, and everyone else copies. It's about giving everyone a chance to think, try, share, refine, and see ideas from multiple perspectives. That's good for you!

In summary, focus on problem solving as a process, embrace and be patient with being stuck and not having answers right away, think about the long game of your personal intellectual development, develop a growth mindset, and work on learning with your classmates. These are things you need to prepare for your future. All people, especially young people, have immense capacity to learn, grow and get a lot smarter! Believe in yourself by actively investing in how you learn.

Best wishes on a successful new school year!

Professor Stan Yoshinobu